청구이의
1. The Defendant’s decision on recommendations for the collection of the collection amount (No. 2018) No. 110 against the Plaintiff of the Gwangju District Court.
1. The following facts do not conflict between the Parties:
On November 26, 2014, 2014, 2014, 2014Gadan57988, the 29,176,314 won loans to A, and its interest and delay damages, were awarded a favorable judgment around April 10, 2015. The above judgment became final and conclusive around that time.
The defendant acquired the claim for the judgment money from the two-way Capital Co., Ltd.
B. On March 7, 2017, based on the executory exemplification of the judgment in the foregoing Gwangju District Court Decision 2014Kadan57988, the Defendant received a claim attachment and collection order as to the amount of wages and retirement allowances that A received every month from the Plaintiff and 1/2 of the above amount until it reaches the above claim amount (the remaining amount excluding the amount corresponding to the amount prescribed by the Civil Execution Act and the Enforcement Decree of the same Act, considering the minimum cost of living under the National Basic Living Security Act), and the above order was served on the Plaintiff at that time.
C. On February 1, 2018, the Defendant filed a claim for collection against the Plaintiff based on the above order of seizure and collection against the Plaintiff (hereinafter “instant order of performance recommendation”) under this court’s 2018 Ghana110, “the Plaintiff shall pay the Plaintiff KRW 15,00,000 and the amount calculated at the rate of 5% per annum from March 9, 2017 to the delivery date of a copy of the complaint, and 15% per annum from the next day to the date of complete payment.” On February 1, 2018, the Defendant made a decision of performance recommendation (hereinafter “decision of performance recommendation of this case”) to recommend the Plaintiff to implement the same as the purport of the claim for the above collection amount (hereinafter “the instant order of performance recommendation”). The Plaintiff did not raise any objection against the instant order of performance recommendation on February 20, 2018, which became final and conclusive around February 20, 2018.
2. The Plaintiff’s assertion and judgment are based on the Civil Execution Act and the Enforcement Decree of the same Act.