beta
(영문) 청주지방법원 2015.05.08 2014가단156538

소유권이전등기절차이행 청구의 소

Text

1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On March 4, 2014, the Plaintiff entered into a sales contract between the Plaintiff and the Defendants on the following grounds: (a) the Defendants and the Defendants entered into a sales contract with the terms that the Plaintiff would purchase each real estate listed in the separate sheet No. 1 (hereinafter “instant land”); (b) the real estate listed in the separate sheet No. 2, “instant land”; and (c) the instant land No. 1 and No. 2; and (d) the terms and conditions of the instant sales contract and the amended special agreement on March 6, 2014, as follows.

A sales contract (land and a right to permit a project)

1. The land indicated in this case 210,000,000 won (Defendant B’s ownership) for the land indicated in this case 110,000,000 won (Defendant C’s ownership);

2. Terms and conditions of the contract: The remainder of KRW 30,000 (payment on March 4, 2014) of the purchase price of KRW 420,000,000 (payment on March 4, 2014) and the special agreement on KRW 390,00,000 (payment on April 15, 2014 and simultaneously with bank loans).

1. The Plaintiff shall divide and return to the Defendants the land excluded from the area of the building permit (200 square meters, 264 square meters) among each of the instant land.

3. The remainder of the purchase price shall be paid in a lump sum by the Defendants’ passbook in the event of bank loans (pre-determined after consultation). 4. The Plaintiff’s relocation and provisional seizure of two graves on the ground of the instant land shall be arranged. In addition, the Plaintiff shall not be liable for the problems prior to the date of this contract related to the instant land.

5. The Defendants paid all necessary documents (such as transfer and receipt, certificate of personal seal impression, seal, etc.) prior to the construction permission and civil engineering permission on each of the instant lands, and the Plaintiff’s sales contract of this case is written as the seller (the Defendant). However, the Plaintiff appears to have been written in writing of “Buyer (Plaintiff)” in the context of the previous and previous transaction.

It shall be delivered to the Plaintiff and there are other documents, etc. necessary for the modification of permitted matters, etc. related to each of the instant lands.