However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. Around 15:30 on August 08, 2014, the Defendant insultd the victim openly by stating that the victim, the owner of the business, “the victim,” “the victim, who is the owner of the business, would be flickly humping” at the “C cafeteria in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, which is located in Suwon-si B, while drinking alcohol at the “C cafeteria” place where one of the Defendant and the victim D (the 50 years of age is 50).

2. The Defendant interfered with the business of the Defendant: (a) at the time and place specified in paragraph (1); (b) at the time and place, the Defendant took a bath with the heavy amount of the fee under the influence of alcohol; and (c) made the customers on the table table attached to the instant restaurant leave the disturbance; and (d) prevented them from entering the restaurant by avoiding the disturbance, such as taking the victim’s abusive language, as described in paragraph (1), thereby obstructing them from entering the restaurant, thereby obstructing the victim’s restaurant business by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of the police statement law to D;

1. Relevant Article 311 of the Criminal Act, Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act, and Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor, respectively;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Consideration of the accused, degree of damage, etc.);

1. Probation and community service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;