2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

A. (1) Number / filing date of the application for the trademark of this case: the clothing of category 25, strings, strings, strings, strings, age limit, strings, strings, strings, strings, strings, strings, bathings, strings, strings, strings, brings, brings, brings, brings, chrings, brugs, brugs, brugs, brugs, strings, inner pantys, strings, strings, strings, strings, strings, strings, and pantys.

나. 선등록상표 (1) 등록번호/출원일/등록일 : 상표등록 A/B/C (2) 구 성 : (3) 지정상품 : 상품류 구분 제25류의 에어로빅복, 레인코트, 롱코트, 망토, 반바지, 반코트, 사파리, 슈트, 스커트, 슬랙스(Slacks), 오버코트, 원피스, 자켓, 잠바, 청바지, 콤비, 투피스, 파카(Parkas), 남방셔츠, 블라우스, 속팬티, 스웨터, 조끼, 카디건, 탱크탑, 페티코트(Petticoats), 폴로셔츠, 풀오버(Pullover), T셔츠, 머프, 목도리, 방한용 장갑, 벙어리 장갑, 숄, 숄더랩(Shoulder wraps), 스카프, 양말, 모자, 의류용 멜빵, 혁대 (4) 등록권리자 : D

C. (1) On September 2, 2014, the examiner of the Korean Intellectual Property Office rendered a decision of refusal on the ground that the trademark of this case is identical to the prior registered trademark and its title, and thus constitutes Article 7(1)7 of the Trademark Act. Accordingly, the Plaintiff filed an appeal against the Intellectual Property Tribunal (2014 won6096).

(2) On October 23, 2015, the Intellectual Property Tribunal rendered the instant trial ruling dismissing the Plaintiff’s above appeal on the grounds as above.

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of Gap 1 and 2 evidence, purport of the whole pleadings

2. The summary of the grounds for revoking the decision of the plaintiff's assertion (1) The trademark applied in this case is remarkably different from the prior registered trademark, and its appearance and concept, and some similarity points are recognized in the title.

Even if it can function as a product source mark, and it is not similar to the mark that is not likely to cause misconceptions and confusions about the source to ordinary consumers, the trademark of this case is the trademark law.