However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On February 23:30, 2015, the Defendant committed an assault by the police officer on the street in front of the 354 community credit cooperatives, the Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan City Do Do Do Do 354, and the security guards belonging to the Seoul Young Police Station B District B Zone B, who was dispatched after receiving a report to handle a traffic accident, to ask the Defendant about the circumstances of the accident. The Defendant committed an assault, i.e., raising his mother and child used by C as a defective knee, thereby falling down on the floor and raising knee to knee, etc. on one occasion.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Examination protocol of the accused by prosecution;

1. Application of each police protocol of statement to C and D

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act on the suspension of execution [the sphere of recommendation] [Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Performance of Official Duties: The basic area of the obstruction of performance of official duties shall be [Article 62(1)] [Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution of Official Duties: The defendant has no person who has been sentenced to a special punishment] [Article 6-1] [Article 6-1]. The defendant's decision of the suspension of execution of official duties shall be deemed to have committed the crime of this case as a result of alcohol; however, the defendant's decision of the suspension of execution of imprisonment shall be sentenced in consideration of all the sentencing conditions expressed in the oral proceedings such as the defendant's age, character and conduct, and circumstances after the crime.

It is so decided as per Disposition for the above reasons.