However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On September 2, 2017, the Defendant, around the new wall on September 2, 2017, conspiredd to steal the storage box of Obaba (hereinafter referred to as “babb”) in front of the Da and E in Ansan-si Group B, Ansan-si.

Accordingly, the defendant colored whether there is any otoba, which is attached to store goods by driving the FST5 car and returning to the day of Ansan, while driving the oba, E and D returned to the day of Ansan in order to keep the goods by driving the oba, which is discovered that the defendant was attached to keep the oba in front of the H located in the Hoba-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Council member G around 06:01 on the same day, while the defendant was found to be attached to the oba in the front of the H located in the Hoba-gu Seoul Metropolitan City Council member G with 06:01.

Accordingly, the Defendant made telephone contact to E and D so that he can gather near the skin house, and the Defendant reported the network, and E and D saw that they keep the goods in two hands, and D divided the storage of the goods in the way of cutting off the string of vinyl, which was cut off from the string line for getting on board the above SM5 string line, and operated by attaching D to the string number string line.

The Defendant, together with E and D, stolen one of the goods storage boxes containing information devices and card devices owned by the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Copy of each protocol concerning the examination of suspect of the police in K, L, or E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the I Statement;

1. Article 331 (2) and (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act to mitigate small amount;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the Suspension of Execution (Considering the fact that the amount of damage is not so significant, that the defendant has no record of punishment for the same kind of crime, and that the defendant shows an attitude against the law of court);