When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On October 6, 2018, the Defendant: (a) 03:35 on October 6, 2018, Cheongju-si, B apartment C, his father, was not opened a door, and walked with the door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door

As a result, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the 112 reporting processing by police officials.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of the police protocol of statement to F;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act and the choice of a fine concerning the crime;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order is that the defendant committed violence against the police officer who called a fluoral failure on the ground that his father does not open the door in the apartment corridor at the new wall time, but it is not good that the defendant has committed the crime. However, the defendant's punishment is determined as ordered by considering the following as a whole: recognition of mistake and reflection, agreement with the victim, absence of any criminal history against the defendant; and the sentencing conditions under Article 51 of the Criminal Act.