2. The judgment of the court below is taking into account the fact that the defendant led to the confession of the crime of this case, and was against the defendant. However, the defendant was sentenced to seven years of imprisonment due to the violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes (Fraud) in 2005, and was released from the court around September 201. The defendant again committed the crime of this case similar to the above fraud during the repeated crime period, except that the defendant paid part of the amount to the victim, and most of the damage was not recovered, and the defendant did not reach an agreement with the victim. In full view of all the sentencing conditions of this case, including the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, circumstances before and after the crime, and circumstances before and after the crime, it cannot be deemed unfair

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.