위증
The defendant shall be innocent.
On August 30, 2010, the defendant in the factory room is present at the court of Ulsan District Court No. 101 (hereinafter referred to as the "court of this case") around 16:30, Ulsan District Court No. 101 (hereinafter referred to as the "court of this case"), and testified after attending and taking an oath as a witness of the defendant's indecent act against the above court No. 2012 high-ranking 1238, C, which is true at around Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, No. 101:05, the defendant, a female driver, was allowed to act on behalf of the defendant, and he was seated with the defendant's chest, who is an engineer for driving on behalf of the defendant, and he is not able to take an oath against the defendant's body, such as the defendant's knife, who was driving on behalf of the defendant, and the defendant's face was not able to have the defendant's body, and the defendant's knife.
Maz.
1. In a case where the defendant made a statement that acknowledged the facts charged at an investigative agency or the court, the credibility of the confession should be determined, taking into consideration whether the contents of the statement are objectively rational, what is the motive or reason of the confession, what is the motive or reason of the confession, what is the circumstance leading to the confession, and what is not contrary to or contradictory to the confession among other evidence than the confession, etc.
(See Supreme Court Decision 2006Do5407 Decided November 23, 2006, etc.). In addition, the burden of proving the facts charged in a criminal trial is to be borne by the public prosecutor, and the conviction is to be based on the evidence of probative value, to the extent that there is no reasonable doubt by the judge that the facts charged are true, so that there is no such evidence.