If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

1. On November 17, 2015, from around 13:30 to 16:00, the Defendant: (a) expressed his/her bath to the effect that in the E-cafeteria operated by the victim D, F, who is an employee of the restaurant, was the Defendant’s handcil at the E-cafeteria operated by the victim D, the restaurant at which he/she had been set up in the above cafeteria, “Chewing year, the same year, the same franch; franch, the franch of the franch; (c) franch; (d) franch; and (e) franch, the Defendant franch in the restaurant with his/her franch, and enter the restaurant with his/her franch.

"" and "the disturbance interfered with the victim's restaurant business by force by driving the disturbance."

2. Definating;

A. On November 18, 2015, the Defendant found in the restaurant as indicated in paragraph 1 at around 11:00 on November 18, 2015 that the victim F was the victim F, as described in paragraph 1, while there was G et al. that he was the restaurant operator, etc., and that the victim F, as described in paragraph 1, “Chewing years, shots” shall be discarded to the victim.

“Publicly insulting the victim.”

B. On November 19, 2015, the Defendant: (a) found in the restaurant specified in paragraph 1 for the foregoing reasons on November 19, 2015; and (b) found his/her employees H, etc., the Defendant: “I am teared to the victim F, “I am for the same year, Chewing years, ambling years, ambiened, and ambiened in a knife; (b) The four-year-year-year-year-year-year-year-year-year-year-year-year-year-year-old

It has the right to substitute the Libya in the Do.

“Publicly insulting the victim.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to F or D;

1. Each statement of G and H;

1. Application of each statute on filing of a complaint;

1. Relevant legal provisions of the Criminal Act, Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with business), Article 311 of the Criminal Act (the point of insult), and the selection of fines, respectively, for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The Defendant, on the grounds of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (i.e., an escape vehicle) in this court on October 6, 2014.