beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2013.10.18 2013고정4381

사문서위조등

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be paid.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant, who forged a private document, was instructed to urge repayment of his/her liability, used his/her service in the company B for the purpose of raising an individual debtor rehabilitation application and submitting it to the court, to forge the certificate of cash payment in the name of the representative director C.

On November 15, 2012, the Defendant confirmed that “A”, “F”, “Seoul City G 201”, “B”, and “B” from March 1, 2010 to March 1, 2010, “on the part of the official title column”, the Defendant, at the office B, located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan DD building A 215, was paid monthly salary to the reporter in cash, on the name column of “A”, “F” in the resident registration number column, in the address column, and in the workplace name column.

On November 15, 2012, the name of the company (State) No. 215, company name of Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D A. 215, company name (State) B. Joint Representative C and H were prepared and printed, and the representative director C’s name and seal imprint were affixed to the name next to C.

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising authority, the defendant made E, who is aware of the fact without authority, prepare a letter of cash payment certificate in the name of B representative director C, a private document on rights and obligations, which is a private document.

2. On February 2, 2013, the Defendant: (a) had a certified judicial scrivener under his name, who is aware of the fact at the Seoul Central District Court located in Seocho-gu, Seocho-gu, Seoul, Seocho-gu, Seoul, submit a forged cash payment certificate in relation to an individual debtor rehabilitation application to the registered public official under his name, who is aware of the fact, as if he were duly formed.

3. The creditor I of the defendant in violation of the Civil Execution Act filed a lawsuit claiming the return of loans against the defendant on February 1, 2012 at the Seoul Central District Court (2012da25218) and the same year.

7.10. The above court 39,000,000 won.

참조조문