except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On April 22, 2014, the Defendant: (a) around 01:20 on the front side of the Dong-gu, Ansan-si, the Defendant: (b) on the 20th day of Ansan-si; (c) on the 112th day before the si; and (d) on the 112th day after having reported that the si does not pay a taxi fee to the si; (d) the police box of the Ansan-gu, the police station; and (e) the police officer called the Defendant to be carrying the Defendant on the patrol vehicle after arresting the Defendant on the charge of fraud; and (d) the police officer called the Defendant “this two-halfs”; and (e) Had the chest part of the D’s chest part on the back hand with the her hand, and interfered with the legitimate execution of public duties for the arrest of the police officer.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to police statements made to F, D, and E;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime concerned;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Article 62 (1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution (Article 62 (1) that reflects the mistake of the defendant, there is no record of the same criminal history and the punishment heavier than that of the same kind of punishment, and other factors such