2. Although the contents of the instant crime committed by the Defendant upon receiving a report 112 and taking account of the following factors: (a) the Defendant did not have previously committed the crime; (b) the Defendant was a contingent crime; (c) the Defendant led to confessions and reflects the Defendant; and (d) other factors of sentencing, including the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, details of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, the sentence of the lower court is too uneasible and unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.