If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

Defendant,

1. On August 2, 2013, around 01:00, the Plaintiff acquired stolen goods after purchasing KRW 30,000 in the price knowing that the name obtained from a taxi engineer who is unable to know his/her name in front of Seongbuk-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government is the cost of Samsung Ggal lusium 2 smartphone, owned by the victim, with knowledge that it is a stolen;

2. On the same day: 01:30 on the same day, Samsung Talopian smartphone, which is owned by the injured party and whose name cannot be known from a taxi driver who is unable to know the name at the above place, acquired stolen goods by purchasing KRW 60,000 for the price knowing that one price is a stolen goods;

3. At around 02:00 on the same day, the victim’s name obtained from C at the above place was known that the victim’s smartphone 1 price is a stolen, and the stolen was purchased at KRW 40,000,000.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Records of seizure and list of seizure [Seoul Central District Prosecutors' Office 2013No. 3414] Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 362 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 362 (1) of the same Act concerning the applicable criminal facts, the selection of fines;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 333 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act for return;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;