beta
(영문) 인천지방법원 2014.07.15 2013가단29782

손해배상(기)

Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. The following facts may be found either in dispute between the parties or in full view of the statements in Gap evidence Nos. 1 to 3 and the purport of the entire pleadings as a result of the physical examination commissioned to the hospital at the discount of this Court:

On March 4, 2012, at around 11:00, the Plaintiff caused an accident in which the Plaintiff’s left skis were faced by the Defendant’s skis going beyond the middle, and the Plaintiff’s left skis from the skis’s skis operated by the Defendant (hereinafter “instant accident”).

B. The Plaintiff was diagnosed by the instant accident, such as “the damage to the human wave and slots from the outer side of the left side of the unit, the damage to the left side slots and salts, the left-hand slots and salts, the left-hand slots and the left-hand slots,” etc., and was hospitalized in B Hospital from March 5, 2012 to April 9, 2012, and from C C Party Members, from April 9, 2012 to April 21, 2012.

C. The Plaintiff was permanently deprived of the labor force equivalent to 14.5% due to the injury to the 20th century, etc. caused by the instant accident.

2. The plaintiff's assertion and judgment that the accident of this case occurred beyond the plaintiff's skiing caused by the defendant's failure to properly perform the removal work. At the time, the defendant provided safety education to the employees who conduct the removal work so that the removal work should be performed thoroughly. If the removal work is not performed within the slot, the accident of this case occurred due to negligence in the safety accident such as suspending the operation of the skiing ground until the safety inspection is completed. Thus, the defendant is obliged to pay the plaintiff the amount stated in the claim as compensation for damages.

However, it seems that the accident of this case occurred due to the defects in the installation or preservation of a skiing ground, such as the defendant's failure to conduct snow removal work properly.