When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The defendant is a person who operates a store C in Ansan-si B.

No one shall put a mark on the containers, packages, or appended documents that may lead to misunderstandings that they have medical efficacy, efficacy, etc., or advertise such contents, and shall sell, store, display for sale, or display for the purpose of sale, things other than quasi-drugs indicated or advertised similar thereto.

그럼에도 불구하고 피고인은 2020. 3. 11.경 위 C 매장에서, 식약처 허가를 받지 않은 일반 마스크를 판매하면서, SNS ‘위쳇(WECHAT)’을 통해 ‘KF94 인증’ 마스크를 판매한다는 내용의 글을 게시하여 광고하고, 위 마스크를 판매하기 위해 KF94 황사방역용 마스크 박스에 담아 진열대에 진열해 놓은 후 1매당 2,800원씩 총 120매를 판매하였다.

As a result, the defendant advertised non-pharmaceutical drugs that have medical efficacy, effects, etc., and displayed and sold them.

Summary of Evidence

1. 피고인의 일부 법정진술 위챗 대화 캡처 내사보고(단속현장 및 마스크 사진 첨부), 내사보고(피의자 마스크 진열 및 위챗 판매 광고 등에 대한) 내사보고(압수물 성능검사 관련) 법령의 적용

1. Article 93(1)10, Article 66, and Article 61(2) of the Pharmaceutical Affairs Act regarding criminal facts: (a) the Defendant, at the time when he/she had experienced a phenomenon of returning Mask-ro 19, sold Mask-ke as if he/she had obtained the certification of the food and drug wife, whose source cannot be known for economic benefit; and (b) it needs to be strictly punished for acts that cause harm to the national health.

However, the fact that the defendant's mistake is against the defendant, the quantity of sales is not clearly known, but it is not confirmed whether it is mass sales, and the case of Makk sold by the defendant.