beta
(영문) 춘천지방법원 속초지원 2018.08.24 2014가단12098

소유권이전등기

Text

1. The Defendants are listed in the separate sheet No. 2, among each real estate listed in the separate sheet No. 1, to the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. Since the Plaintiff purchased and possessed each real estate listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “each of the instant real estate”) from W on September 28, 1988, the Plaintiff occupied each of the instant real estate until now since its commencement.

B. On January 7, 1965, X completed the registration of ownership preservation on each of the instant real property, and died on February 5, 1968.

The defendants are as shown in the attached Table 2 that X's heir's share in inheritance is as shown in the attached Table 2.

[Ground of recognition] The plaintiff, defendant E, and F: Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 13, Gap evidence Nos. 15 through 18 (including paper numbers), the purport of the whole pleadings and the remainder of the defendants: Confession

2. According to the above facts of recognition, the Defendants are obligated to implement the registration procedure for ownership transfer on the ground of the completion of the prescriptive prescription as of August 20, 201, which was selected by the Plaintiff at will from August 20, 1991, which was 20 years after September 28, 198 as to each of the corresponding inheritance shares listed in the separate sheet No. 2, among each of the instant real estate, to the Plaintiff.

As to this, Defendant E has a defense to the effect that the Plaintiff’s possession of each of the instant real estate is the possession of a third party, but there is no evidence to acknowledge this, the said defense cannot be accepted.

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim against the defendants is justified, and it is so decided as per Disposition by admitting all of the claims.