except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of a C Poter cargo vehicle.

Around 17:40 on May 17, 2016, the Defendant driven the above cargo vehicle and proceeded at a speed that would make it impossible to identify the speed of the air through the high surface of the high-speed high-speed road, which is located in the early high surface of the high-speed high-speed road in the territorial sea.

Since there is a place where a road is in progress, there is no distinction between roads, so there was a duty of care to prevent accidents by driving a vehicle in advance by taking into account whether there is a vehicle driving the said section, such as taking a front door and left door well, and accurately operating the steering and steering system of the vehicle.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected to do so and neglected to do so and neglected to do so, and received the full part of the cargo vehicle operated by the defendant as the part of the cargo vehicle operated by the victim D(CA) which was driven by the victim D(CA) who was driven by the right-hand village village protection area from the 23th national road bank, the left-hand side of the defendant's proceeding direction.

Ultimately, around 00:03 on May 18, 2016 by occupational negligence, the Defendant received the victims from the Joseon University Hospital located in 365 in Gwangju Dong-gu, to receive the blood therapy due to liver heat, and caused the death of the victim due to malmal blood coasis and disability.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. A death certificate;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning facts constituting an offense, and Articles 3 (1) and 268 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents According to the Selection of Punishment;

1. Suspension of execution under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (including the cases of violation, the fact that there is no previous offense exceeding the fine, the fact that there was an endeavor to recover damage, and the fact that there was an smooth agreement with the victim and his bereaved family members);