When the defendant does not pay a fine, 100,000 won.

1. Around 01:00 on August 3, 2013, the Defendant forged a private document by entering the name and resident registration number of “G and H” on the back of the check in the course of calculating the telecom amounting to 1,00,000 won cashier’s check number (F) from the Ecomter operated in Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, Nam-gu.

2. The Defendant: (a) issued a forged cashier’s check to D without knowledge of its circumstances at the time and place specified in paragraph (1) and exercised the check under the pretext of the telecom.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police suspect interrogation protocol against the defendant;

1. Written statements of D;

1. Application of the statutes on the copies of resignations;

1. Relevant Article 231 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, Articles 234 and 231 of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to concurrent crimes;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.