However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On July 26, 2013, around 14:00, the Defendant appeared and taken an oath as a witness of the Defendant’s case interfering with auction against the above court’s 2013Kadan622 and 2 other than C, etc. in the Daegu District Court Decision 230, Yongsan-dong 230, Yongsan-gu, Daegu District Court Decision 200.

The Defendant testified to the presiding judge of the first criminal body of the above court in the trial of the instant case to the effect that “A, etc. was never involved in the construction of the lease contract and the application for distribution of the lease contract for the D Apartment-gu 101 705, Daegu Suwon-gu Do 101 705, and there was no error in the method of preparing the form. There was no information on the method of preparing the form. ② The chief of the corporation of the (ju) EE, which is attached to the construction contract document attached to the construction report attached to the lien report, was sent directly by the E-E. In addition, the Defendant testified to the effect that the corporation head of the (ju) E was also made.”

However, on December 23, 2011, the Defendant, at the time when C and F made a false lease contract and made a report to the court on the right and a request for distribution, notified C that “A would be a person who lives in the same way.” On February 27, 2012, the Defendant assisted F to apply for a false demand for distribution by C and F, by notifying F of the method of preparing a written application for demand for distribution. On February 27, 2012, the Defendant made a false contract for construction works submitted by the Defendant upon reporting a lien in the name of C’s wife G in the name of C and made the corporate master of C and signed and sealed the corporate master on the construction contract.

In this way, the defendant made a false statement contrary to his memory and raised perjury.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Copy of the examination record of witness (C, F);

1. Copies of the third protocol of trial and copies of the protocol of examination of witness in the case No. 2013 Go-Ma62 of the Daegu District Court (A);

1. One copy of the judgment (Evidence No. 79 of Evidence), investigation report (Attachment to the judgment of the appellate court in the case of obstruction of auction); and

1. A copy of records of the H civil execution case, and a report on rights.