도로법위반
The defendant shall be innocent.
1. The summary of the facts charged in this case is that the defendant's employee operated a cargo vehicle A while he violated the limited weight around May 26, 1994 in relation to the defendant's business.
2. Determination
A. The prosecutor brought a public prosecution against the above facts charged by applying Articles 86 and 83 (1) 2 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4545 of Mar. 10, 1993, and amended by Act No. 4920 of Jan. 5, 1995).
B. Article 86 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4545, Mar. 10, 193; Act No. 4920, Jan. 5, 1995; Act No. 4920, Jun. 1, 1993); Article 86 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4920, Jan. 5, 1995; Act No. 7832, Dec. 30, 2005); Article 86 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 7832, Dec. 30; Act No. 7832, Dec. 10, 2005; Act No. 8497, Mar. 21, 2008; Act No. 945, Apr. 1, 2005; Act No. 9777, Mar. 19, 2005)
Thus, the facts charged of this case constitute a case that does not constitute a crime, and thus, the defendant is acquitted under the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.