beta
(영문) 창원지방법원 통영지원 2017.01.26 2016고단1826

사문서위조등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal history] The Defendant is a person who has a total of three times the same kind of force, including a fine of two million won due to a violation of road traffic laws (drinking) in the Changwon District Court’s branch on February 10, 201, and a fine of seven million won due to a violation of road traffic laws in the same court on December 15, 2014.

[Criminal facts]

1. On November 17, 2016, the Defendant driven a DNA-learning car under the influence of alcohol content of about 0.154% without obtaining a driver’s license from a section of about 2 km from the front of the Pyeongtaek-dong community service center located in Pyeongtaek-dong at the city of Gyeongnam-si to the front of the Cjuju station located in the city of Gyeongnam-si to the road in the city of Gyeongnam-si.

2. On November 17, 2016, the Defendant violated the Resident Registration Act at around 00:40, the Defendant respondeded to the Defendant “C” to check the back of the resident registration number of the said G by means of a computer, after having sought confirmation of his/her personal information by driving alcohol from the slope F belonging to C District E District in the G District Police Station, which was under the Defendant’s demand for confirmation of his/her personal information by driving alcohol on the front of the C District Gas Station E District, on the road in front of the C District Gas Station, and having been under the Defendant’s demand for confirmation of his/her personal information.

In this respect, the defendant used another person's resident registration number unlawfully.

3. The Defendant, at the time, at the time, and at the place specified in the foregoing paragraph 2, prepared a statement report on the situation of the driver working at the State, and continuously demanded the Defendant to sign and affix a seal to the Defendant, the Defendant: (a) arbitrarily signed the statement report on the situation of the driver working at the State in the name of the driver working at the State - - blue-type with the intention of exercising the Defendant’s signature and seal; (b) forged the statement report on the situation of the driver working at the State - in the name of G, which is a private document concerning the factual verification; and (c) exercised the false private document as if it was duly formed with the said F without knowledge of the fact.

(i) the evidence;