도로법위반
The defendant shall be innocent.
The summary of the facts charged in this case is as follows: A, an employee of the defendant, violated the restriction on the operation of a vehicle by the road management authority in the course of operating B vehicles from the direction of the inspection of the control of the vehicle in front of the traffic limit (NN No. 7 lines) in the case of the transmission of B vehicles in the north-gu at Port on November 20, 205, if the transmission of the vehicle to North-gu at Port on November 10, 2005
Article 86 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4920 of Jan. 5, 1995, and amended by Act No. 7832 of Dec. 30, 2005), which is the applicable provisions of the facts charged, has lost its effect due to the decision of unconstitutionality as of Oct. 28, 2010 2010Hun-Ga14, 15 (Joint), 21 (Joint), 27 (Joint), 35 (Joint), 38 (Joint), 44 (Joint), and 70 (Joint), which is the applicable provisions of the above facts charged.
Thus, the facts charged in this case constitute a case that does not constitute a crime, and thus, the defendant is acquitted under the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.
The Institute of Jind Co., Ltd.