beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 평택지원 2018.01.25 2017가단4121

부동산소유권이전등기절차이행

Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. The Plaintiff asserted that the Plaintiff: (a) executed a civil construction project for constructing two rows on both the lands of the C and D; (b) transferred the said construction project to E; (c) on June 24, 2002, the settlement amount of E and construction cost was set at KRW 125 million; and (d) on the method of payment, two households should be registered after completion of the tenement house; and (c) the instant real estate also promised to the Plaintiff to accept the registration of ownership transfer.

Since the real owner of the instant real estate is Defendant Dong E, the Defendant is obligated to implement the registration procedure for ownership transfer of the instant real estate to the Plaintiff pursuant to the above agreement.

2. The Plaintiff agreed to the Plaintiff to accept the registration of ownership transfer with respect to the instant real estate solely based on the written statement in Gap evidence No. 1.

The Plaintiff’s claim based on the premise that there is no other evidence to prove the fact that the real owner of the instant real estate is E is insufficient.

3. Dismissal of the Plaintiff’s claim