A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000, and by a fine of KRW 1,000,000, respectively.

The above fines are imposed by the Defendants.

1. On July 2, 2014, Defendant B, while meeting at the Seodaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government E Apartment Management Office on July 10:30, 2014, the Defendant got the victim A (69 years of age) and vagabonds, and got the victim to knife with the wall and pushed the victim into the wall, thereby causing approximately two weeks of treatment to the victim.

2. Defendant A, at the time and place specified in paragraph (1), became a victim B (the age of 60) and vagabonds, followed by hand the victim’s right hand, and knife the victim’s right hand, and knife the victim with the wall, and knife the victim into the wall for about two weeks, thereby requiring treatment for the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each legal statement of the witness F, A, and B in part;

1. Each written diagnosis;

1. Each upper part of the body (the witness F and A's statement that the defendant Eul inflicted an injury on the victim A. On the other hand, even if the victim Eul delayed a criminal complaint against the defendant Eul, the victim Eul appealed to the hospital on the day following the occurrence of the injury in the judgment, and according to the injury diagnosis document (the investigation record No. 27 of the investigation record), according to the body diagnosis document (the investigation record), the witness F was written on the part of the son's son's son's son and the son's son's son's son's son's son's son's fight, not on the whole fighting of the defendant A and the victim's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son.

1. Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 257 (1) of the same Act concerning the applicable criminal facts, the selection of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reasons why the sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, based on the provisional payment order, led to fighting between the Defendants.