A shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive, the above sentence against Defendant A.

- Defendant A is the child of the victim D (M, 84 years of age).

On July 18, 2012, at around 23:00, the Defendant got the victim from the front sperm of the Defendant’s house in Daegu-gun E, to go home, and had the victim take care of his face at one time in drinking.

As a result, the defendant was injured by the victim, who is a lineal ascendant, such as a multi-faceted salutism.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of witness D;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Investigative report (in relation to attachment of a family relation certificate, etc.), - Family relation certificate;

1. The investigation report (as to the attachment of photographs of the upper part of the victim), - photographs, investigation reports (as to the attachment of a medical certificate of injury), - The injury medical certificate;

1. The defendant asserts that no investigation report (F counterpart search of village residents), investigation report (G or other community residents' additional search), investigation report (community residents' search and investigation report), investigation report (information on the phone statement of a witness), and investigation report (recording and hearing of the statement of a witness) do not take place when the victim was injured as stated in the facts constituting the crime.

However, the victim stated that the defendant was living in front of the joint sperm (hereinafter referred to as "heat") on the day of the instant case that the defendant was living in his house and when the face was taken. On the night on the day of the instant case, the village resident F made a statement that the victim's face was unfolded on the following day, and that the victim's face was unfolded. The defendant also recognized the fact that the victim forced the victim to not enter the joint sperm around 23:00 on the day of the instant case, and H was called "I will live in that I will live in that I want to live." And according to the evidence duly adopted and investigated, it is recognized that the defendant was injured the victim as stated in the criminal facts.

Application of Statutes

1. Relevant Articles of the Act and punishment concerning the facts constituting the crime;