However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of a passenger car B.

1. Around 22:45 on October 23, 2016, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (i.e., post-accident) driving the said car, leading the D convenience store located in Suwon-gu, Busan to the e-mail from the off-distance side to the e-mail Korea’s age.

At the time, there are many vehicles illegally parked on the road, so there were duty of care to safely operate the vehicle by accurately operating the steering system, steering system, and operating the steering system.

Nevertheless, the Defendant was parked in front of the above convenience point due to negligence in the course of duty while driving without due care due to negligence while neglecting this.

E received the part of the victim FF car following the G food car managed by the Defendant as the front part of the passenger car in front of the passenger car operated by the Defendant.

Ultimately, the Defendant, by occupational negligence as seen above, escaped without destroying the victim’s food car and taking necessary measures to cover KRW 9,246,537 of the repair cost, such as the exchange of a spread.

2. Around October 23, 2016, the Defendant, as stated in paragraph 1, destroyed a food-driven car and escaped, driven the said passenger car with the alcohol concentration of 0.142% in the blood, and driven the said passenger car into the south east-dong of Busan, Seocheon-gu, Busan, while driving the four-lane road in the vicinity of the fee for re-transmission of the efribbbbb between the south-dong and the south-dong.

Since the luminous Hambane is a one-way road from the south-west side to the broadband, there was a duty of care to enter the luminous Hamban by properly examining the direction of the vehicle in the vehicle driving service.

Nevertheless, the defendant is under the influence of liquor without neglecting this.