도로교통법위반(음주측정거부)
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 6,000,000.
When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.
Punishment of the crime
On March 22, 2015, at around 01:15, the Defendant, at around 01:15, drives Cpoter spackspackspackspackspack on a level of about one kilometer from the front of the post office in the Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu to the front road 743-6, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu.
After receiving a report, it was discovered to E by the vice superintendent of the D District Police Station of the Busan District Police Station.
Recognizing that a police officer was driven while under the influence of alcohol, such as smelling at the defendant's entrance, snicking and smelting, the police officer requested a drinking test on several occasions, such as around 02:07 (1), around 02:18 (2), and around 02:29 (3) on the same day, but rejected it without good cause.
Summary of Evidence
1. Partial statement of the defendant;
1. A copy of the report on detection of a drinking driver and the register of users of a drinking measuring instrument;
1. Each investigation report and investigation report (Attachment, such as a list of cases reported, 112);
1. The Defendant asserts that he did not drive under the influence of alcohol by entering his house and drinking alcohol after driving.
However, according to the evidence duly adopted and examined, ① on March 22, 2015, 01:15: 01:15, the Defendant refused to take a alcohol-free measurement; ④ the police officer confirmed that the Defendant was a person who was a person who was a fine for soft-gu, f, was parked; ② the police officer was dispatched to the same place at 01:16 on the same day; ② the police officer was dispatched at 01:18 on the same day; ③ the truck was parked and parked and sent to the same place at around 01:18 on the same day; ③ the police officer was asked to take a alcohol-free measurement; ④ the police officer confirmed that the Defendant was a person who was a fine for so on; and ④ the Defendant again requested to take a alcohol-free measurement on three occasions, but the fact that the Defendant refused to take a alcohol-free measurement on three occasions can be acknowledged.
According to the facts of recognition, the defendant is suspected to have driven a drunk.