손해배상(기)
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
1. Facts of recognition;
A. (1) Around June 22, 2016, the Daegu Metropolitan City Dong-gu requested a proposal for each video monitoring device product of the seven companies, including the Plaintiff, in accordance with the two-stage competition method under a contract with multiple suppliers, while promoting the “B business” (hereinafter “instant business”).
(2) On June 24, 2016, the Plaintiff submitted to the Daegu-gu Seoul Metropolitan City Dong-gu a proposal to supply cost of KRW 2,472,300, a video monitoring device registered as a unit price of KRW 2,747,00 (the model name: C and the Red Sea Ba (the model name: D); hereinafter referred to as “existing product”) at the national site.
(3) On June 29, 2016, Daegu Metropolitan City Dong-gu selected the Plaintiff as a supply company based on the results of the proposal assessment on the basis of the results of the proposal assessment, and published the results to the national master, and the Daegu Local Government Procurement Service under the Defendant’s control (hereinafter “Defendant”) notified the Plaintiff of the demand for the installment supply of the following details on June 30, 2016:
(hereinafter referred to as "goods contract") demanding and notifying supply: The method of payment by the plaintiff: The contract for substitute payment by the plaintiff: The name of the third party's unit price: The name of the B project (the project in this case): 2,472,300 won for video monitoring device, A, C, and the outdoor monitoring system: 249 won: 615,602,70 won: The delivery period of the designated place of delivery by the end-user institution: August 28, 2016 (hereinafter referred to as "supply contract in this case").
(1) On July 1, 2016, the Daegu Metropolitan City Dong-gu sent the general specifications of information and communications construction projects to the Plaintiff by e-mail around the progress of the instant supply contract.
(2) On July 5, 2016, the Plaintiff submitted to the Dong-gu, Daegu-gu, Seoul-gu, a field agent system including a certificate of employment, a copy of the certificate of qualification, and a schedule of scheduled progress. On the same day, the person in charge of the Dong-gu, Daegu-gu (hereinafter “instant special specifications”) presented the following special specifications to the Plaintiff on the same day.
Special specifications 1.1.