However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On April 9, 2013, the Defendant changed one copy of a promissory note in the name of C in the name of C in the name of the securities company, without authority, and exercised it by allowing F to affix the seal of C in the name of C in the middle line of the front receiver column of a promissory note (D) in the face value of 49.5 million won, issued by C in March 7, 2013 by C in which it is impossible to know the trade name near the Manam-si Suwon-si Suwon-si Suwon-si Si, the Defendant: (a) had C in the name of C in the name of the securities company, and (b) had G deliver the altered promissory note to G, which is not aware of the alteration.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement concerning G and F;

1. Application of statutes on copies of promissory notes;

1. Relevant Articles 214 (1), 217, and 34 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Suspension of execution under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act does not have the same criminal record for the defendant, and a revised promissory note shall be issued, and it shall be taken into account that there is no

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 62-2 or more of the Criminal Act;