However, from the date of the conclusion of the judgment, each of the defendants is against the defendants for one year from the date of the judgment.

1. On May 18, 2017, the Defendant: (a) around 23:05, on the roads nearby Gwanak-gu in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, and (b) on the grounds that the police box affiliated with the Seoul Gwanak-gu Police Station D police station D, who was dispatched after receiving a report of assault, would restrain the fighting between the Defendant and the Defendant’s birth relationship; and (c) took a bath to the above E on the grounds that the police officer’s legitimate performance of official duties was interfered with the prevention, suppression, and investigation of crimes by pushing the Defendant’s chest and necks of the E at hand.

2. Defendant B, at the above date, at the above time and place, arrested Defendant B as a current offender at the Gyeong-gu Police Station G G G G in Seoul due to the suspicion of interference with the performance of official duties as seen above, Defendant B obstructed police officers’ legitimate performance of official duties in relation to the prevention, suppression, and investigation of the crime by walking the bridge of the above H one time by walking the bridge.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police statement made to H and E;

1. A written statement of I;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a investigative report (to screen screen pictures suspending CCTV images and CCTV images analysis);

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Unfavorable circumstances for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution: The crime of this case is a case in which the Defendants committed assault against a police officer in the course of performing official duties without any justifiable reason, and the circumstances, method, etc. are favorable in light of the nature of the crime; the crime of this case is committed against the wrongness while being committed; the crime of this case appears to have been committed contingently; Defendant A is the beginning offender and Defendant B did not have any criminal record exceeding the fine; the above circumstances and the extent and result of the commission of the crime of this case; the circumstances leading up to the crime of this case; the degree and consequence of the crime; the circumstances after the crime of this case; and other various circumstances, which are the conditions for sentencing as shown in the records and arguments of this case, including the age, sexual conduct, environment, etc.