However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On August 5, 2018, the Defendant driven a BFD car at around 23:10, and was negligent in driving at the speed of 60km/h above 49.2km/h above 49.2km/h above 49.2km from the junc, the Defendant was driven at the speed of 3 lanes in front of the Gangnam City, along the two lanes from the junc, and was driven at the speed of 60km/h above 49.2km/h above 109.2km from the junc, the Defendant was driven at the speed of the victim D(58 ) who tried to walk to the opposite lane from the 3rd parallel of the manc Defendant’s front line, and received the left-hand part of the car as the front-hand part of the Rad motor vehicle.

As a result, the Defendant suffered from the 12 weeks of medical treatment due to the above occupational negligence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. [Report on internal history (Confirmation of Blue Vehicle Stacking Images) - Blue Vehicle Blue image pictures], [Report on internal history (related to data submitted by the Road Traffic Authority) - Traffic accident analysis], [Report on internal history (Re-Selection of Suspected Persons) - Slue Slue Slue Slue Slue Slue Slue Slue Slue Slue]

1. Reporting on the occurrence of a traffic accident, reporting on a traffic accident, and application of statutes governing site photographs;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents under the relevant Act concerning criminal facts, Article 268 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act ( comprehensively considering the fact that the insured is covered by a comprehensive insurance, the victim does not want to be punished against the accused,

1. An order to attend a course under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;