A. On May 19, 2012, the Plaintiff (a male, a female, and the birth of August 1985) and C (a female, August 19, 1985) are married married on May 19, 2012. On July 4, 2012, a couple who reported marriage has been married dives (E).

B. As to the time first known to the Defendant and C around 2019, the Defendant ( male, July 1991, 199) asserted that the Plaintiff was around March 2019, and the Defendant was around September 2019.

C was first aware of Da as a guest in the dental shop operated by C, and thereafter frequently visited Doctrine and became friendly with C.

(c)

In October 2019, the defendant and C attended the window pury at the night around the end of October 2019 and sent time to other people and photographs from the street.

At the time, the defendant was influencing with yellow dracks and bags, and C was influcing with yellow dracks and scarp, etc., and was influcated by external appearance.

(d)

C The Plaintiff is expected to be married to the Plaintiff.

It refers to the travel from January 11, 2020 to January 15, 2020 to the defendant and the red bean.

C had almost little contact with the plaintiff and his father during the travel period. For this reason, the plaintiff and C have proved to the majority, and they were selected from the middle of January 2020.

【Ground for Recognition: Facts without dispute, Gap’s entries and images of evidence Nos. 1, 2, 5 through 7, and 9, and the result of factual inquiries into the Seoul Immigration Control Office of this Court, the purport of the entire pleadings

2. Determination

A. In principle, a third party who renders a judgment on the cause of a claim by committing an unlawful act with the spouse, thereby infringing on a couple’s communal life falling under the essence of marriage or interfering with the maintenance thereof and infringing on the spouse’s right as the spouse, thereby causing mental pain to the spouse, constitutes a tort (Supreme Court Decision 2013Meu2441 Decided May 29, 2015). According to the above facts found, barring any special circumstance, the Defendant’s act of taking overseas travel for five days and C with the spouse constitutes a tort against the Plaintiff.