2. The fact that the amount of fraud of the instant crime is not significant is the sentencing data favorable to the Defendant.

However, in full view of the fact that there is no agreement between the defendant and the victim, the defendant has a criminal records of the same kind, including the sentence imposed on him/her, and other factors of sentencing as shown in the argument of this case, including the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, family relationship, motive and circumstance of the crime, means and consequence of the crime, etc., the sentence of the court below is too unreasonable since it is too unreasonable. Thus, the argument in the grounds for appeal by the defendant is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.