2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

A. The court has stated this case as to this case.

Except for the addition of some contents as stated in the judgment of the court of the first instance, it is identical to the reasons for the judgment of the court of the first instance.

B. The following is added to the fourth 16th 16th son of the judgment of the first instance.

The plaintiff asserts to the purport that it is improper to require specific proof to him/her in a situation where the plaintiff does not communicate with local figures in the trial.

The plaintiff at the first instance court and the first instance court did not present any evidence supporting his/her claim in addition to the notice of disposition by the Ministry of Justice.

In addition, even if the plaintiff's assertion is considered, it cannot be seen that there was an imminent situation to the extent that it can be used as the basis for refugee status, and it is not consistent and persuasive.

At the time of refugee interview investigation, the Plaintiff stated that the parent of Pakistan was in contact with his wife one to two times a week and three times a week.

In addition, in full view of the Plaintiff’s entry route, the period from entry into the Republic of Korea to refugee application, the details of the application for refugee status, etc., there is no sufficient fear to deem that the Plaintiff is likely to be detrimental on the ground of race, religion, nationality, membership of a specific social group, or political opinion.

According to this, the plaintiff's assertion is not accepted.

2. The plaintiff's claim for conclusion shall be dismissed on the ground that the plaintiff's claim is without merit.

The judgment of the court of first instance is justifiable in conclusion as above.

Therefore, the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed because it is without merit.