If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

At around 19:30 on January 1, 2015, the Defendant expressed a 112-report to the effect that “the drinking person can enjoy on the road,” and that “D and E, etc. belonging to the small police station C district unit of the small police station called the above police officer who was sent out after having received a 112-report to the effect that “the above police officers are prone to the road,” and caused the above police officers to take a bath to read “the bucker, frighter, etc.,” and continued to turn back the parts of the above D’s buckbbucks to treat the Defendant’s face, and the police officers refused medical treatment while transferred to the Incheon Central Hospital Office for the treatment of the Defendant’s face, and obstructed the police officers’ legitimate performance of duties in relation to the handling of the 112 reported case.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to D and E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a copy of work place;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

2. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the confinement of a workhouse.

3. The sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act reflects the defendant's fault in depth and decides the punishment as ordered in consideration of the fact that there is only one time before and after the previous conviction of a fine without the same kind of previous conviction.