beta
(영문) 창원지방법원 2013.09.24 2013고정779

특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)

Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a motor vehicle Erate.

On January 8, 2013, around 19:15, the Defendant had a duty of care to look at the front side of the STX Research Institute, which is located in the Seocho-gu, Changcheon-do, Changwon-si, and to prevent accidents by accurately manipulating the steering direction and operating the steering system.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected this and got the victim to go beyond the ground on the left side of the victim F (the age of 40) who was coming to the right side of the moving direction due to negligence.

Although the Defendant suffered from the left-hand salt panion, etc. by occupational negligence, the Defendant immediately stopped the victim and escaped without taking measures, such as providing relief to the victim, even though he/she suffered around three weeks of medical treatment.

2. From the police to this court, the Defendant consistently failed to recognize that DMB was at the time during the operation, and on the other hand, argued that the Defendant did not have any intention to commit the escape, deeming that the Defendant had shocked the objects such as the package branches on the road while driving, and that the Defendant had no intention to commit the crime of escape.

In light of the records, the following circumstances, i.e., the point of time when the accident occurred, i.e., the vehicle operated on the road at the time when the accident occurred on the road without delivery, where the vehicle was operated on the road without delivery of one-lane, and the pedestrian victim also had no vehicle driving on the road at the time when the accident in this case occurred.