성폭력범죄의처벌등에관한특례법위반(카메라등이용촬영)
The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.
1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (a punishment of eight months of imprisonment and two years of suspended execution, community service order80 hours, 40 hours of attending order, confiscation) declared by the court below is too unfasible and unreasonable.
2. In light of the frequency, period, and recording of the instant crime, etc., although the nature of the crime is not weak, the Defendant’s perception of the instant charge and reflects the Defendant’s mistake in depth. The Defendant’s assertion is without merit, given that the pictures of this case appear to have been leaked or distributed outside, and that the Defendant is a primary offender without any previous conviction, and all of the sentencing conditions indicated in the instant records and arguments, such as the Defendant’s age, character and behavior, environment, family relationship, and circumstances after the crime, etc., it is not recognized that the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable. Thus, the Prosecutor’s assertion is without merit.
3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.