When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The Defendant is a business operator who leases construction machinery, such as Crawls, to C from June 10, 2009 to December 31, 2013, the construction period of construction is the Korea Gas Corporation, Won-do Construction and KK Construction Co., Ltd., the first subcontractor's Dispute ResolutionB, and the second subcontractor's Dispute Resolution Co., Ltd., the second subcontractor's Dispute Resolution Co., Ltd., about about about 10 months.

The Defendant, who did not receive approximately KRW 100,000,000 from the Dispute Resolution Co., Ltd., requested the Victim and the Dispute Resolution Co., Ltd. to pay the fees, was rejected, and the Korea Gas Corporation did not file a civil petition to the effect that “B In the process of this construction, defective construction has been done, and any other defect has been made.” In the process, the Defendant was willing to attract the atmosphere to be disadvantaged in the process of construction without resolving the civil petition to the effect that “B in the process of construction, and there is any other defect.

around 14:15 on July 31, 2012, the Defendant informed the audit office of Korea Gas Corporation to the effect that “B performed fraudulent construction works in connection with the installation of emult file” by telephone at an insular place. Around that time, the Defendant received promissory note KRW 100 million and KRW 50 million from F, who is the actual operator of emult B of the emult District, to the effect that “the Defendant would withdraw the civil petition filed by the Korea Gas Corporation”, which was known to the victim Nonparty B, “I would give additional information without giving money.” By threatening F, who is the actual operator of the emult District of the emult District, in order to withdraw equipment rent and information through E at the insular coffee shop located in Seongbuk-si, Sung-si, e.g., the Defendant received promissory note KRW 100 million and KRW 50 million from cash.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused by the prosecution;

1. The second statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. Statement protocol by the police for E;

1. Investigation reports (in cases of attaching documents related to public interest information), investigation reports (in cases of reporting on the confirmation of the amount of damage);

1. Written withdrawal and commitment of the public interest report, each agreement, photograph, record, work executor's execution certificate;