2. The Defendant could have been punished for violence-related crimes, including prior convictions entered in the first head written in the judgment of the court below, and in particular, even during the period of suspended execution, committed each of the instant crimes, and did not receive a letter from the victims up to the trial.

However, the defendant's confession reflects his mistake in depth, and there is no record of punishment for the same crime with respect to the crime of violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes.

In addition, comprehensively taking account of the motive, means and result of the instant crime, the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, health status, previous conviction, and circumstances after the commission of the crime, the lower court’s punishment is too uneasy and unreasonable.

3. The prosecutor's appeal of conclusion is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit.