Even if the defendant did not have awareness that the above contents are false, the defendant did not have awareness.

Since the defendant merely stated that he was believed to be true or true facts for the benefit of the entire members of the above shopping mall, the illegality is dismissed.

Nevertheless, the judgment of the court below which convicted the Defendant of the facts charged of this case is erroneous and adversely affected by the judgment.

2. The following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the lower court, i.e., whether the victim has consistently called “two books” to the Chairperson of D School Dormitory from the date of the instant complaint to the court of the lower court, and the victim’s phone calls to the Chairperson of D School Dormitory.

The phrase “water” is a true fact, and if a separate book is entered in a dormitory by creating a book, it would be impossible to make the book, and would make the Defendant liable for damages, who is the president of the shopping mall.

According to the recording containing the contents of telephone communications between the victim and the above autonomous chairperson on February 14, 2012, the above autonomous chairperson stated that he/she does not have any fact, and that he/she was called "in one part of the members of the shopping mall association", the above autonomous chairperson was called "in one part of the members of the shopping mall association."

Whether there is a word that the two books are entered, which is so called “Isson’s Madson”

Then, I asked to see that “I do not have any such whistle,” and I asked to see that I would like to confirm the fact by disclosing the thickness of the president of the commercial conference (Defendant) and I would like to see that I would like to see.

Since the number last remains and later, the part that was later known to the president of the PP (victim) that he dranks.