The defendant is a person who has operated a job placement office that introduces entertainment receptions to singing rooms in his office located in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu.

1. Around February 12, 2012, the Defendant made a false statement that “A victim C (the age of 47) will pay the principal and interest in full for five months, if the Defendant borrowed KRW 17 million as it is necessary to operate job placement services.”

However, the defendant did not have a good financial situation at the time, and the financial situation of the job placement office operated is not good, so even if he borrowed money from the victim, he did not have an intention or ability to repay it.

After all, on the 14th day of the same month from the victim, the defendant received money of KRW 10 million from the victim to the new bank account under his own name and KRW 7 million from the national bank account under his/her name, and acquired it by fraud.

2. On May 30, 2012, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “If the Defendant lends KRW 1,00,000,000 to the victim, who already lent the funds necessary for the operation of the job placement office, would be repaid together with KRW 17,00,000,000,000, which was already lent to the victim of the victim C (the age of 47) located in the

However, the defendant did not have a good financial situation at the time, and the financial situation of the job placement office operated is not good, so even if he borrowed money from the victim, he did not have an intention or ability to repay it.

After all, the defendant was obtained from the victim, that is, one million won from the seat, and acquired it by fraud.

3. On August 24, 2012, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “Around August 24, 2012, the Defendant would pay the principal and interest by using only three months if it is urgently needed to lend KRW 10 million to the victim at a one-time restaurant operated by the victim G (the age of 48) located in the Seo-gu, Seoan-gu, Seocheon-gu.”

However, the defendant did not have a good financial situation at the time, and the financial situation of the job placement office operated is not good, so even if he borrowed money from the victim, he did not have an intention or ability to repay it.

In the end, the defendant is against the victim.