On May 5, 2017, the Defendant driven the above cargo vehicle around 07:10 and proceeded along one lane with the south-lane of two lanes near the Nam-gu, Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-do, the south side of the two-lane near the Nam-gu, Ulsan-do, the South-do, the South-do, the South-do, Ulsan-do.

In such a case, a driver has a duty of care to safely drive a vehicle due to the prevention of collision with the preceding vehicle in the operation of the preceding vehicle by putting the front side and accurately operating the steering gear and maintaining the distance between the preceding vehicle.

The Defendant’s negligence, while neglecting the above duty of care, led Defendant D(53) drivers of the Victim D(53)’s low-speed-free car driving that stopped after speed on the front side of the Defendant’s vehicle, to drive the Defendant’s cargo front-hand driver, and the Defendant’s vehicle in the front-hand drive of the Victim F(45 years old) in the front-hand drive.

Ultimately, the Defendant, by such occupational negligence, damaged the victim D’s chills, tensions, etc., requiring approximately three weeks of treatment, and inflicted injury on the victim F, such as base salt, tensions, and so on. At the same time, at the same time, damaged the victim D’s low-speed car in excess of KRW 4,542,623, repair cost, and damaged the victim F’s car in excess of KRW 3,140,038, respectively.

2. The crime of non-competence of judgment: The judgment dismissing a public prosecution seeking non-competence of punishment against the defendant after the prosecution of this case by the victims of Article 3 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents: Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.