2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion that the Plaintiff was holding office as the head of the Defendant’s headquarters abroad from June 2, 2010 to February 12, 2014, and did not claim that the Plaintiff paid the amount against the Defendant, claiming that the Plaintiff was not paid the amount of wages of KRW 91,332,30 (i.e., wages of USD 38,637,30 from April 5, 2013 to February 12, 2014) calculated by an agreement that occurred during the said period ($ 39,000 from June 2, 2010 to November 21, 2011. < Amended by Act No. 13937, Dec. 3, 2011 to February 24, 2012; Act No. 138, Feb. 5, 2013>

B. In light of the following circumstances: (a) the Plaintiff explained the Defendant’s representative director D, E, C, and Plaintiff 4 who became aware of Nonparty C’s introduction and agreed to proceed with the Kakhish aggregate business with their respective shares in June 2010; (b) there is no evidence to support the Plaintiff’s assertion that specific amount of wages or working period was fixed; and (c) there is no evidence to support the Plaintiff’s claim for wages to the Defendant even though it was not paid at all while performing the Defendant’s duties in Kakhish for 3 years and 6 months; and (d) there is no evidence to support that there was a partnership business relationship between the Plaintiff, D, E, and C for Kahish aggregate business; and (e) there is no evidence to support that the evidence submitted by the Plaintiff alone was concluded between the Plaintiff and the Defendant as alleged by the Plaintiff; and (b) there is no other evidence to support the remainder of the Plaintiff’s assertion in the above premise without any reason.

On the other hand, even if the Plaintiff’s wage claim is recognized, the Defendant before June 27, 2013.