However, from the date of the final judgment of this case, each of the above two years against the Defendants.

G and H used to operate “J”, which is a single name “J (Junk) casino room” (referring to a casino gambling room in which local organized violence ships, etc. are paid with a certain deposit and directly operates a hotel casino in proportion to the profits determined between the casino company and the casino company) in I casino located in the Philippines, and K (C) is called as “K director” from the so-called “J 18,” which is the above hotel’s clock room, and the person in charge of attracting and operating the said hotel, employees, and fund management, and the person in charge of operating the casino from L and M&B (which became final and conclusive on November 15, 2016) borrowed the money to Defendant 1’s daily chip and then borrowed the money to Defendant 1, who was in charge of operating the casino, and then borrowed the money to Defendant 1’s daily chip and collected the money from Defendant 1, who was in charge of daily chip from the above hotel.”

1. Defendant B, including Defendant B’s Lambling site G, paid a certain amount of money to a casino operator, and made it possible for the casino operator to do gambling, such as “Kakra,” and divided the profits from the casino operator into 5:5. K’s employees to provide access cards and casino chips to customers while serving in the above JJ’s employees, and the Defendant explained the way of handling or operating the Hekb, and M and L explained the way of operating the Hekb to the Hek games, by attracting Korean won in Korea.