정보공개거부처분취소
1. Of the instant lawsuit, the part concerning the claim for revocation of a disposition rejecting the disclosure of information on the information listed in paragraph 4 of the attached list.
1. Details of the disposition;
A. On October 3, 2013, the Plaintiff reported on October 3, 2013 the upper house resident’s property damage, but upon the completion of internal investigation, filed a claim for the disclosure of the relevant records (hereinafter “instant records”) with the Defendant on July 19, 2016 regarding the instant case.
B. On July 22, 2016, the Defendant decided to disclose the information on the Plaintiff’s report on internal investigation, report on occurrence (damage and destruction of property), statement of claimant, documents submitted by the claimant, a written request for appraisal of ingredients, on-site photographs, etc., but did not disclose each of the information listed in paragraphs 1 through 3 of the attached Table (hereinafter “instant information”).
(hereinafter “Disposition in this case”). / [Grounds for recognition] without dispute, entry of Gap evidence Nos. 2 and 3, and purport of the whole pleadings
2. The details of the relevant Acts and subordinate statutes are as shown in attached statutes;
3. Determination on the defense prior to the merits
A. The defendant's assertion that the defendant decided to disclose all the information the plaintiff wants on July 22, 2016. Thus, there was no disclosure refusal disposition itself, which caused lack of eligible status, and there is no interest in the lawsuit since it is unclear whether the plaintiff requested disclosure of certain information.
Meanwhile, the information set forth in paragraph 4 of the separate sheet set out in the separate sheet set out in the separate sheet set out in the separate sheet set out in paragraph 4 is limited to the number of pages at the right side of the paper recording at the time of printing in order to bind the paper records into paper records, which is one-six-six-six-six/6/6/6, and the document currently owned by the defendant is not a document.
B. 1) In light of the fact that the information disclosure system is a system that discloses information held and managed by a public institution, it is highly probable that the person seeking information will hold and manage the information by an administrative agency.