beta
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2016.02.19 2014가단13829

손해배상(기)

Text

1. The Plaintiff, ① Defendant C is 25,000,000 won (22,50,000 among them are jointly with Defendant D who was the co-defendant of this case).

Reasons

1. Indication of claims: To be listed in the grounds for the claims in attached Form;

(4) The court below's decision on July 10, 1998 (Article 208 (3) 3 of the Civil Procedure Act), which held that "the mental suffering that occurred in the course of the occurrence of property damage shall be charged with property damage as a result of property damage, unless there are special circumstances to deem that the compensation for property damage is serious to the extent that it is not sufficient to compensate for it," is still insufficient to prove "special circumstances" as referred to in Supreme Court Decision 96Da38971 Decided July 10, 1998. Thus, the plaintiff's claim for consolation money against the defendant B is not accepted, but the claim for consolation money against the defendant B is not reasonable, and it is not reasonable to dispute with the defendant B's claim for compensation for property damage, and it is 15% per annum from the day following the day when the copy of the complaint of this case was delivered to the

3. The Plaintiff’s apportionment of litigation costs among the Defendant B (proviso to Article 101 of the Civil Procedure Act)