When the defendant was at the face of the parking administrator F (the age of 62) who is much older than himself, he reported it to the police and the circumstances before the crime are not good. The defendant justified his behavior on the ground of his taking and assaulted to the police officer E who is leading, without any justifiable reason, and used violence to the victim G who prevents him. The police officers used the electronic shock machine three times, and used it seriously to the extent that the police officers could control and control them, and the degree of damage is serious due to the above crime, the police officers suffered from the belf which requires three weeks medical treatment. The defendant was committed in the earth, and the defendant was committed in the earth, and the defendant did not make any effort to recover from damage, and the defendant did not have any specific effort to do so, and there is no reason to believe that the defendant's punishment is unfair, considering the following circumstances, such as how to commit the crime, how to commit the crime in this case, the circumstances of the defendant's age after the crime in this case, and the circumstances and circumstances of the crime in this case.

Therefore, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.