beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 2014.12.11 2014고정1284

사문서위조등

Text

The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

Reasons

1. Facts charged;

A. The primary facts charged D, E, with the intention of paying brokerage commission and incentives for supporting moving-in from Hanwon-si F, G Officetel and commercial building sale by Hanwon-si Construction, the Defendant, who had operated the I Licensed Real Estate Agent Office in Yongsan-gu, Yongsan-gu, Seoul, who entered into a lease contract in the name of the lessor and lessee who entered into the existing lease contract with the L which had operated the I Licensed Real Estate Agent Office in Yongsan-gu, Yongsan-gu, Seoul, and agreed to use the lease contract in the name of the lessor and lessee who entered into the lease contract with the said brokerage commission and the incentive for supporting moving-in.

(1) On January 17, 2009, in collusion with D, E, the Defendant entered, without authority, M and N’s resident registration number and address in the column of “leased” and “Lessee” by using a computer for the purpose of exercising at the office of sale in Suwon-gu F, G Officetel and the office of sale in commercial buildings, and entered and printed out the name and address of the International Licensed Real Estate Agent’s Office operated by the Defendant in the column of “ broker”, and then, each “leased” and “Lessee” forged a pre-tax contract with respect to rights and duties by copying and attaching seals affixed to the seals affixed to the existing pre-tax contract form on the basis of the name of each “Lessee” and “Lessee” and “Lessee”, including forging one copy of the pre-tax contract form with respect to officetels 101 and 802 from the time to March 6, 2009, as indicated in the attached Table 1 through 12.

(2) The Defendant’s uttering of the above investigation document in collusion with D, E, and submitted to the person in charge of Hansung Construction who is aware of the forgery at the place indicated in paragraph (1) of Jan. 209, as if he were duly formed with the completion of the charter contract of the attached list Nos. 1 through 5 of the forged crime list, respectively, and submitted at the same place on March 9, 2009, the charter contract of the attached list Nos. 6 through 12 of the forged crime list was duly formed.