제3자이의
1. The Defendant’s enforcement of the Seoul Northern District Court Decision 2015Kadan19206 Decided September 1, 2015 against Nonparty C.
1. Upon the Defendant’s application as a creditor of the basic facts, the seizure of corporeal movables was conducted on each of the items listed in the attached list Nos. 1, 2, and 3 on March 26, 2019, based on the executory exemplification of the 2015Da19206 Decided September 1, 2015 against Nonparty C, the debtor, on the basis of the executory exemplification of the judgment rendered by the Seoul Northern District Court Decision
[Ground of recognition] A without dispute, entry of evidence No. 3, purport of the whole pleadings
2. The portion of non-performance of compulsory execution: In full view of the purport of the entire pleadings, the price for the items listed in Paragraph 2 of the attached Table shall be recognized as having been paid by the plaintiff in the card of the plaintiff, as stated in Paragraph 2 of the attached Table Nos. 2, 4, and 5
The plaintiff may seek the exclusion of compulsory execution against the above goods as the owner of the goods specified in attached Table 2.
3. Parts allowing compulsory execution: there is no evidence to acknowledge that the property is owned by the plaintiff as to each item listed in the separate sheet Nos. 1 and 3 of the Attached List No. 1 and 3.
4. If so, the plaintiff's claim of this case is justified within the above scope of recognition, and the remaining claims are dismissed as they are without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.